Satanman

Totally Naked Commentary

When I introduced the concept of Satanman, I never expected the strong reactions it would provoke. Some Real-Life Superheroes were outraged, interpreting my association of Batman with Satan as offensive—not only to their faith but also to the integrity of Batman himself. To them, I had committed a sin against God and insulted a symbol of justice.

But let’s take a step back. Batman, as a character, is the intellectual property of DC Comics and Warner Brothers. While many see him as a force for good, there’s little inherently good about an IP owned by a corporation. The dark truth behind Batman’s history makes this even clearer—Bob Kane may be credited as his creator, but it was Bill Finger who developed the elements that made the character legendary. Yet, Kane profited from the lie, while Finger, the true visionary behind Batman, died in obscurity. Today, few self-respecting comic creators have anything positive to say about Bob Kane, and the character itself, while beloved, carries a legacy built on exploitation.

Satanman emerged from a creative exploration, inspired by stories like Marvels and Kingdom Come. I wanted to craft a world of heroes grounded in realism. Naturally, a Batman-type figure would adopt a frightening persona—what’s more terrifying than Satan himself? Visually, the character blended the aesthetics of Daredevil and Batman, creating something both familiar and fresh. And beyond the controversy, drawing Satanman remains an exciting creative challenge, proving that sometimes, pushing boundaries is what makes storytelling truly compelling.